Research Report · February 27, 2026

Perplexity Computer
Mobile App Development Assessment

Product launched: February 25, 2026 · Researcher: Claude Sonnet 4.6
End-to-End Native Mobile App Score: 2.5 / 10
Perplexity Computer is real — launched Feb 25, 2026 — coordinating 19 AI models in a cloud sandbox. It claims to code, deploy, and manage full projects from a single prompt. However, it has essentially no public track record, its own press demo was canceled due to bugs, and zero documented native iOS/Android apps exist. For production mobile development, it is not a reliable solo solution today — it's a promising orchestration layer, not an app builder.

1. What Is Perplexity Computer?

Perplexity Computer is a multi-model agent orchestration platform — a "general-purpose digital worker" that accepts a high-level goal, decomposes it into subtasks, and delegates each to the most capable AI model. It runs entirely in the cloud in an isolated sandbox with a real filesystem, browser, and ~400 tool integrations.

Model Architecture

TaskModel
Core reasoning & codingClaude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic)
Deep researchGemini (Google)
Image generationNano Banana (Google)
Video generationVeo 3.1 (Google)
Lightweight tasksGrok (xAI)
Long-context & web searchChatGPT 5.2 (OpenAI)
Additional13 more (not all named)

Pricing

TierPriceAccess
Perplexity Max$200/month✅ Available now
Perplexity EnterpriseCustomRolling out
Perplexity Pro$20/monthRolling out

10,000 credits/month included + 20,000 bonus for first 30 days. Per-token billing on top of subscription.

⚠️ Launch context: Perplexity's own scheduled press demo was canceled hours before showtime because they found product flaws. The product has been live for two days.

2. Mobile App Development Capabilities

Perplexity's marketing explicitly cites mobile app development: "build me an Android app…" and "build an app that provides ski resort snow conditions." They claim to "research, design, code, deploy, and manage any project end-to-end."

What Has Actually Been Demonstrated

Why Native Mobile Is Hard for Computer

No Native Build Toolchain

Xcode and Android SDK require local macOS/Linux environments. A cloud browser sandbox can't run them.

No Simulator Access

Testing React Native or Flutter requires a simulator or real device — not available in a browser-based sandbox.

No App Store Pipeline

Signing certificates, provisioning profiles, and binary builds require local Xcode on macOS. Cannot be automated in cloud.

No Runtime Feedback Loop

Can't run native code and get error output — debugging is limited to static analysis only.

3. Comparison vs. Alternatives

ToolMobile SupportExecutionVerdict
Perplexity ComputerWeb confirmed; native ❌Cloud sandboxUncertain
Claude Code (local)Full — runs your build toolsLocal machineBetter for mobile
CursorFull IDE — RN/Flutter with setupLocal machineBetter for mobile
Bolt.newWeb apps onlyCloud (StackBlitz)No native
LovableWeb apps onlyCloudNo native
Replit AgentWeb; limited nativeCloud (Replit)Similar limits

4. Hard Limits & Failure Modes

5. Realistic Workflow for a Mobile App

1

Research + Architecture (Strong ✅)

Computer handles this well. Use Gemini for research, Opus for synthesis. Solid architecture and data model output.

2

Code Scaffolding (Uncertain ⚠️)

Claude Opus 4.6 generates React Native code into the sandbox filesystem. You can't run it there — must extract and set up locally.

3

Local Setup (You're doing dev work now ❌)

Download generated code, set up Expo/RN locally, fix environment issues. Almost certain to need debugging — this is where it breaks without a dev.

4

Debugging (Partially useful ⚠️)

Paste errors back to Computer. Opus 4.6 suggests fixes. Essentially a fancy Claude chat for debugging — useful but not autonomous.

5

App Store Submission (Manual, outside Computer ❌)

Requires Xcode, signing certs, provisioning, screenshots, metadata. Computer cannot do this autonomously.

6. Final Verdict

2.5
Overall Score
End-to-end native mobile
8
Web Apps
Likely much stronger here
9
Research + Design
Multi-model research is strong
0
App Store Submit
Cannot do this autonomously

What it's good for today: Web app prototyping, research + architecture planning, backend API code generation, multi-step automation, content/marketing assets, documentation.

Where it breaks for mobile: Native compilation, simulator testing, Xcode/Android Studio integration, app signing, App Store submission, long debugging loops on device-specific bugs.

Bottom line: Perplexity Computer is not a mobile app builder. It's a general-purpose AI orchestration platform. In 6–12 months, with native build environment support, this verdict could change — but today a developer is still required for any production-quality native mobile app.

Sources